A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Procedure for Efficient Bayesian Inference on the Phase-Type Aging Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase-type aging model (PTAM) belongs to a class of Coxian-type Markovian models that can provide a quantitative description of well-known aging characteristics that are part of a genetically determined, progressive, and irreversible process. Due to its unique parameter structure, estimation via the MLE method presents a considerable estimability issue, whereby profile likelihood functions are flat and analytically intractable. In this study, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based Bayesian methodology is proposed and applied to the PTAM, with a view to improving parameter estimability. The proposed method provides two methodological extensions based on an existing MCMC inference method. First, we propose a two-level MCMC sampling scheme that makes the method applicable to situations where the posterior distributions do not assume simple forms after data augmentation. Secondly, an existing data augmentation technique for Bayesian inference on continuous phase-type distributions is further developed in order to incorporate left-truncated data. While numerical results indicate that the proposed methodology improves parameter estimability via sound prior distributions, this approach may also be utilized as a stand-alone statistical model-fitting technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".