MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Environmental controls on the development of early life stages of European smelt in the Elbe estuary

2025· article· en· W4413777768 on OpenAlexaff
David Drewes, Corinna Schrum, Johannes Pein, Déborah Benkort, Ute Daewel

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Modelling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsEstuarySmeltEnvironmental scienceEcologyGeographyFisheryBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• First Individual-based model for European smelt in a German estuary. • Model simulating egg to larvae stage development under changing conditions. • Sensitivity testing of in- and extrinsic factors on growth via random sampling technique. • Model validated using field data and catch monitoring across multiple years. The anadromous European smelt ( Osmerus eperlanus ) is a commonly observed fish in the German estuaries of Elbe, Ems and Weser. Their substantial contribution to local biomass and its ecological role as a “wasp-waist” species, show their importance as a key species in estuarine ecosystems. However, recent studies indicate a rapid decrease in smelt populations across all German estuaries. Potential extrinsic drivers of the decrease include climate change driven temperature increase, shifts in food availability and increasing anthropogenic pressures across the estuarine environment. To investigate possible drivers of mortality of early life stages we present an individual-based model (IBM) for the European smelt, applied in a 1D setup. The model includes development during endogenous life stages, the transition to first feeding and growth-related bioenergetic calculations of 0+ larvae. The sensitivity of the model to changes of intrinsic coefficients and extrinsic drivers was tested using ensemble simulations. Ensembles input data was randomly sampled using a Latin Hypercube Sampling routine (LHS). The model’s ability to reproduce interannual development variability is tested using a combined input dataset including field measurements and bioecological model output. The model allows us to determine important processes that impact the individual survival throughout its lifetime. We present the model validation along with a dedicated parameter sensitivity study on the individual survival. Using field data, the interannual variability of development rates in the model are compared to available monitoring datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological ModellingSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207