MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413788786 · doi:10.1016/j.cnp.2025.07.007

Presence of interictal epileptiform EEG discharges implies increased risk of recurrence after the first unprovoked seizure: Report of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

2025· review· en· W4413788786 on OpenAlex
Betül Baykan, John Dunne, Samuel Wiebe, Louis Maillard, Sándor Beniczky, Michalis Koutroumanidis, Margitta Seeck

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Neurophysiology Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDanmarks Frie ForskningsfondSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungEuropean CommissionHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeInnovationsfonden
KeywordsClinical neurophysiologyIctalElectroencephalographyEpilepsyMedicineNeurophysiologyRussian federationEpileptic seizureAnesthesiaNeuroscienceCardiologyAudiologyPsychologyPsychiatryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: A joint International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology - International League Against Epilepsy (IFCN-ILAE) Taskforce was created to explore the published evidence for initial EEGs in the evaluation of patients who experienced their first unprovoked seizure, and to determine the diagnostic value of EEG in supporting the diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review, with two independent authors screening each study. We extracted seizure recurrence data among patients with EEG showing interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) versus those with normal or nonspecific-abnormal EEG results. Random-effects meta-analyses of seizure recurrence in relation to IEDs was conducted in the included studies, calculating odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) and diagnostic accuracy. Results: A total of 4847 patients from 22 studies with variable follow-up durations were analysed. The random-effects pooled binary estimate of seizure recurrence was 47 % (95 % CI 40 %-55 %). The overall proportion with seizure recurrence was higher in patients with IEDs (60 %; 95 % CI 53 %-68 %) compared to those without (40 %; 95 % CI 33 %-48 %, p < 0.001). Random-effects meta-analysis showed that the presence of IEDs was associated with seizure recurrence (OR: 2.32, 95 % CI 1.69-3.17, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of adults and children showed that this difference remained significant in both groups: OR in children of 3.24 (95 % CI 2.19-4.79) and in adults of 1.55 (95 % CI 1.08-2.21). In eight studies (n = 1209, 923 children) patients remained untreated before the second seizure; the pooled probability of seizure recurrence in those with IED in these studies was no different than in studies in which some patients were treated. Significance: In conclusion, the presence of IEDs in EEG recordings obtained after the first unprovoked seizure can help clinicians to confirm the clinical diagnosis of epilepsy after a first unprovoked seizure, according to the revised ILAE definition. These results support the relevance of IED detection on EEG as a predictor of seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure. However, its prognostic value is influenced by age and other clinical factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it