MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413791890 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.25.25334354

A single centre randomised, feasibility study using point-of-care (POC) testing for respiratory viruses to direct oral corticosteroids use in preschool-aged children with acute wheeze. A Protocol

2025· preprint· en· W4413791890 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hannah Norman-Bruce, Clare Mills, Holly Drummond, Kathy Li, Hannah Mitchell, Lisa McFetridge, Mark D Lyttle, Damian Roland, Ian Sinha, Thomas Waterfield, Helen Groves

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityAsthma and Lung UKQueen's University BelfastHealth and Social Care Northern Ireland
KeywordsMedicineWheezeProtocol (science)Point-of-care testingPediatricsRespiratory systemIntensive care medicineInternal medicineImmunologyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Wheezing in the pre-school aged group (under 5 years) is a common presentation and significant healthcare burden. It is a heterogenous presentation representing a spectrum of phenotypes and although the causes may be multifactorial, viral infection is the most common trigger, with rhinovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) being the most commonly detected. Rigorous evidence-based guidance for the acute management of preschool wheeze (PW) with respect to which children likely to benefit from oral corticosteroid therapy (OCS), is lacking. RCTs of OCS use in PW have not adequately assessed the impact of respiratory virus testing in the management of PW. To address the hypothesis that OCS response may be determined by the specific virus, the feasibility of performing POC respiratory virus tests prior to randomisation in an acute paediatric ED setting needs to be ascertained. Methods The PRECISE Study will be a single centre, randomised, open-label, feasibility trial. Children aged 24-59 months with acute wheeze will be eligible if the clinician is uncertain if there is a role for oral corticosteroid therapy or not. At enrolment, participants will undergo a nasal swab for rapid respiratory virus testing. Children will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral dexamethasone or not, based on their RSV result. Participants will continue to be managed by the clinician according to local guidance. They will be invited for clinical review at 72 hours where a repeat nasal swab may be performed. There will be a telephone follow up at one month and parents will be invited for extended telephone interviews within a further month. Comprehensive screening logs will address the primary outcome of recruitment and timeliness until enrolment. Remaining timeliness and adherence outcomes will be recorded in individual participant records and described using CONSORT diagrams. Acceptability will be measured using a mixed method qualitative approach based on the theory of acceptability framework. Discussion This pragmatically designed trial will address key feasibility points needed to inform a future, definitive multi-centre RCT prospectively testing the role of respiratory virus testing to randomise children with PW to receive oral corticosteroids or not. Trial registration NCT06580600 ( clinicaltrials.gov )

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→