Prevalence and Risk of Dementia Among Adults Who Have Experienced Homelessness, a Meta‐Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Understanding the prevalence and risk of dementia in homeless adults has important implications for ensuring appropriate resources are directed towards dementia prevention and healthy aging. We aimed to estimate the: (1) prevalence and (2) risk of dementia among homeless adults, and (3) risk of homelessness in adults experiencing dementia. Methods A systematic search was completed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Social Works Abstracts, and the gray literature from inception to September 26, 2024. Studies investigating the prevalence of dementia among individuals experiencing homelessness aged 18 years or older were included. Title, abstract, and full text screening, extraction, and risk of bias assessments were completed in duplicate. Random effects meta‐analysis using generalized linear mixed models was used to estimate the prevalence of dementia. For the risk and incidence of dementia, we meta‐analyzed the risk and hazards of dementia comparing homeless to housed individuals. Results A total of 1585 citations were retrieved, with 102 studies undergoing full‐text review. Thirty‐six studies were included in the final review (504,766 individuals experiencing homelessness, with the following weighted by sample size: mean age 63.08, female percentage 10.64). The prevalence of dementia was 6.81% (95% CI: 4.49, 10.19%, I 2 = 99.7%). Among those who experienced homelessness compared to housed individuals, the risk ratio for dementia was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.52, 2.03, I 2 = 99.7%), and the incidence (hazard ratio) for dementia was 1.54 (0.52, 4.50, I 2 = 98.0%). One study showed that a younger age was associated with homelessness among adults with dementia. Conclusions This systematic review and meta‐analysis suggests that homeless individuals have a dementia prevalence higher than population‐based studies of housed adults of a similar age, where the estimated prevalence is under 3%. Research on models of care aimed at reducing homelessness in those experiencing dementia is needed. Trial Registration PROSPERO: CRD42024595047
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.039 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".