MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413799555 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16885-7

Horse model of spontaneous atrial fibrillation share proteomic changes with humans

2025· article· en· W4413799555 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Dalgas Nissen, Joakim Bastrup, Simon Libak Haugaard, Rikke Marion-Knudsen, Mélodie J. Schneider, Sofie Troest Kjeldsen, Helena Carstensen, Charlotte Hopster‐Iversen, Stanley Nattel, Thomas A. Jepps, Rikke Buhl

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNovo Nordisk FondenLundbeckfonden
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationMedicineHorseInternal medicineCardiologyProteomicsBioinformaticsBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Horses and humans are among the few mammals susceptible to spontaneous atrial fibrillation (AF), both suffering from high recurrence rates after treatment. Treatment resistance is often attributed to progressive atrial remodeling, but current treatment options fail to effectively address this aspect. Here, we introduce a novel horse model of spontaneous AF to investigate the biological pathway changes in early stages of the disease. Through data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry on biopsies from the right and left atrium and left ventricular chamber of horses with early-stage persistent AF (n = 8) and controls (n = 8), we identify several differentially regulated proteins across all three chambers. Pathway enrichment analyses and histological stainings highlight a significant role of atrial extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling in early AF. Other key proteomic changes relate to metabolism, contractility, and protein-folding, and overlap with findings from publicly available human datasets. Our results demonstrate that horses and humans share several AF-related proteomic changes, providing translational insights into the early atrial remodeling processes that are likely to contribute to treatment resistance. These protein-level changes could serve as biomarkers or pharmacological targets for preventing AF-associated atrial remodeling and improve treatment outcomes across species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→