MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413800281 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.27.25334535

Dual Cannabis-Methamphetamine Use Doubles Bipolar Disorder Risk After Psychosis: A 25-Year Inpatient Cohort Study from Iran

2025· preprint· en· W4413800281 on OpenAlexaff
Zeinab Khodaparast, Peyman Saeedi, Haniyeh Rashidi, Mahin Seifi Alan, Mahya Dorri, Farzaneh Mirsharifi, Elham Molaei Birgani, Hadith Rastad

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersAlborz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsBipolar disorderCannabisPsychosisPsychiatryMethamphetamineCohortPsychologyMedicineCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective This study aimed to estimate transition rates from substance-induced psychosis (SIP) to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, evaluate the risk associated with dual use of methamphetamine and cannabis, and identify predictors of chronicity among Iranian men. Methods A 25-year retrospective cohort study (1999–2024) was conducted using clinical data from Shafa Hospital, a tertiary psychiatric referral center in Guilan Province, Iran. The study included 258 male inpatients aged ≥17 years with SIP attributed to cannabis and/or methamphetamine use. Patients with a history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder were excluded. Outcomes were validated using DSM-V criteria, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were employed for analysis. Results Over a median follow-up of 33 months, 37.6% of participants transitioned to schizophrenia (25.2%) or bipolar disorder (12.4%). The median time to conversion was shorter for bipolar disorder (13.4 months) compared to schizophrenia (26.6 months). Dual cannabis-methamphetamine use significantly increased the risk of bipolar disorder (p=0.008). Familial psychiatric history doubled the risk of schizophrenia (HR=4.29, 95% CI: 2.48–7.41) and tripled the risk of bipolar disorder (HR=3.89, 95% CI: 1.87–8.11). Recurrent hospitalizations were associated with increased risks for both schizophrenia (HR=1.34) and bipolar disorder (HR=2.64). The cumulative incidence of schizophrenia rose linearly to 67.6% at 10 years. Conclusion SIP poses a significant risk for the development of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, particularly in cases involving dual-substance use, younger age, familial psychiatric history, and frequent hospitalizations. The findings underscore the need for targeted surveillance, early intervention, and long-term, risk-stratified care models in regions with rising methamphetamine use to reduce SIP-related morbidity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicBipolar Disorder and Treatment→French-language works237,207→