Lipids Engage a Kidney-Brain GDF15 Axis to Suppress Food Intake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is an anorectic and weight loss-inducing hormone that responds to stimuli such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, exercise, metformin, and, more recently, dietary lipids. Given its potential as an antiobesogenic agent, we examined how endogenous GDF15 responds to an Intralipid infusion in different organs to regulate food intake in vivo. We found that an acute Intralipid infusion into the upper small intestine (USI) inhibited food intake and increased plasma GDF15, as well as kidney and hepatic Gdf15 expression in chow-fed but not high-fat (HF)-induced hyperphagic male rats. Kidney Gdf15 knockdown blunted Intralipid-induced increases in kidney and plasma GDF15 levels as well as its feeding-lowering effects, while hepatic Gdf15 expression remained unaffected. Lastly, we knocked down GDNF family receptor α-like (Gfral) in the area postrema, which negated the feeding-lowering effect of Intralipid despite a rise in plasma GDF15 levels in chow rats. In summary, we report that kidney GDF15 is necessary for USI intralipid sensing to trigger an area postrema axis to inhibit food intake. We propose that HF feeding impairs acute lipid sensing to lower feeding by negating the lipid-regulatory effect on kidney GDF15. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Upper small intestine lipid infusion increases kidney, hepatic, and plasma growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) levels in chow but not high-fat rats. Upper small intestine lipid infusion lowers food intake in chow but not high-fat rats. Knockdown of kidney Gdf15 negates lipids to increase plasma GDF15 and lower feeding. Knockdown of GDNF family receptor α-like (Gfral) in the area postrema negates lipid anorectic effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".