From Catharsis to Critical Discourse: Theatre’s Role in Modern Western Democracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The often cried lament “Democracy is dead!” has been heard again with a new intensity following the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. Yet in Western representative democracy, political participation has already been largely reduced to only episodic elections, leaving citizens disconnected from most decision-making. In contrast, theatre and its live communal nature acts as a vessel for inspiring direct engagement, uniting audiences through common embodied experiences. This paper examines the enduring relationship between theatre and democracy, arguing that performance remains a crucial forum for exploring three key democratic tenets: multivocality, political participation, and equality—all integral to any genuine democracy. By drawing on Greek history, politics, and theatre theorists, as well as two contemporary theatre case studies, Porte Parole’s The Assembly and The DAN School’s The Other Shore, this study explores how theatre has functioned as a democratic tool in Western society since Ancient Greece, where tragedy fostered and cathartically resolved collective concerns in the theatre space, to modern productions that prompt active political discourse. The Assembly, a verbatim documentary theatre piece, mirrors representative democracy by staging condensed pre-recorded political conversations, then briefly allowing audience participation before cutting it off, highlighting unsettling systematic limitations. The Other Shore examines the dangers of groupthink under direct democracy through ensemble storytelling and abstraction, with audiences facing each other, provoking interpretation, critical reflection, and dialogue when exiting the space. Both productions strategically incite the questioning of rigid democratic structures. This paper argues that theatre’s liveness—its ability to create diverse ephemeral communal spaces—offers a key alternative to the fragmented nature of representative democracy. In a time of staunch polarization and disengagement, theatre remains a vital democratic tool that disrupts passive spectatorship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.061 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".