MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413807984 · doi:10.1144/geoenergy2025-005

Clean energy storage potential (hydrogen and CAES) in salt formations of Western Canada: a geological review

2025· article· en· W4413807984 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Pavel Kabanov

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoenergy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsCompressed air energy storageEnergy storageHydrogen storageEnvironmental scienceSalt (chemistry)HydrogenWaste managementGeologyChemistryEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground H 2 gas storage (UHS) and compressed air energy storage (CAES) are two novel applications of salt caverns essential for net-zero carbon economy. This review assesses rock salt units available for UHS and CAES in the subsurface of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). In the industrially developed WCSB south of 60° N, thick halite formations for gas storage occur in the Devonian Elk Point Group. Three salt units suitable for cavern emplacement are the Upper Lotsberg Formation halite (≤183 m thick), the Cold Lake Formation halite (mostly ≤40 m but locally >100 m) and halite-dominated occurrences in the Prairie Evaporite Formation (≤210 m). To the north of 60° N, the thickest salt units of the broadest geographical expanse occur in the Saline River Formation of Cambrian age. The Saline River salts stretch across frontier areas and require more subsurface exploration for cavern emplacement potential. Whereas the Elk Point Group salts are entirely undeformed and bedded, the Saline River halites extend into the Laramide Cordillera where they form salt walls and diapirs. The salt caverns of the WCSB are used for liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas storage and waste disposal. The depth range for cavern emplacement is between the groundwater protection depth ( c . 100–600 m) and 2000 m (lithostatic pressure ( S v ) ≤37 MPa and temperature ≤90°C). There are 196 salt caverns in the public records, of these 133 are currently in UGS or waste disposal use. The vast majority are conventional caverns washed by direct single-well leaching, and 23% of the WCSB caverns are operated with dual or triple entry. Most caverns ( c . 90%) have a volume of less than 300 000 m 3 , and several larger (up to 756 000 m 3 ) caverns are used for permanent waste fill. As of 2025, the first UHS–CAES cavern operation is under construction. The Upper Lotsberg halite is chemically the cleanest and most homogeneous halite in the WCSB that is suitable for UHS, although the occurrence of this salt is most geographically restricted. The Prairie Evaporite salt occurs over the broadest geographical expanse in three provinces but cavern-purposed halites there tend to be less pure. In Saskatchewan, the upper Prairie Evaporite Formation is not suitable for gas storage caverns due to a high content of carnallite and sylvite. In UHS applications, the high reactivity of H 2 and production of H 2 S through microbial sulfate reduction will narrow the choice to the cleanest halite beds with a negligible sulfate mineral content, such as the Upper Lotsberg Formation halite and the cleanest halite occurrences of the Prairie Evaporite Formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoenergySame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207