MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413809199 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf611

Germline and somatic variants in <i>DNMT3A</i> and other clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential genes contribute to pulmonary arterial hypertension

2025· article· en· W4413809199 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruaa Al‐Qazazi, Isaac Emon, François Potus, Ashley Martin, Patrícia Lima, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Benjamin P. Ott, Kuang‐Hueih Chen, Danchen Wu, Asish Dasgupta, Curtis Noordhof, Lindsay Jefferson, Marco M. Buttigieg, Amy J. M. McNaughton, Charles C.T. Hindmarch, Alexander G. Bick, William C. Nichols, Wendy K. Chung, Paul M. Hassoun, Rachel L. Damico, Na Zhu, Yufeng Shen, Michael J. Rauh, Stephen L. Archer

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecQueen's University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNorges IdrettshøgskoleCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Institutes of HealthOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchCanadian Vascular NetworkCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJPB Foundation
KeywordsGermlineSomatic cellGermline mutationMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchGeneticsImmunologyGeneBiologyMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple germline gene variants promote familial and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, none are consistently identified in associated PAH with connective tissue disease (APAH-CTD). Moreover, the role of somatic variants in genes mediating clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in PAH is unknown. Here, somatic and germline DNMT3A variants and CHIP gene variants in PAH were evaluated. METHODS: Exome sequencing (ES) was compared between PAH Biobank participants (n = 1832 European ancestry/2572 total), vs. gnomAD controls (7509 European ancestry/141 456 total). Subsequently, targeted panel sequencing (TPS) of 22 CHIP genes, including DNMT3A, was performed in PAH (n = 1659) vs. controls (n = 3644). Somatic CHIP variants in the UK Biobank using ES (controls = 448 239; PAH = 2559) were also assessed. DNMT3A mRNA expression was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with scleroderma APAH-CTD (n = 50), idiopathic PAH (n = 30), scleroderma without PAH (n = 19), and healthy controls (n = 41). Hemodynamic were evaluated in haematopoietic Dnmt3a-knockout mice. RESULTS: Predicted deleterious germline DNMT3A variants were increased in subjects of European ancestry (6/1832) vs. controls (6/7509) (relative risk [RR] = 4.1, P = .018). In the entire PAH Biobank cohort (n = 2572), DNMT3A germline and somatic variants were further enriched (PAH: 1.28% vs. controls: .43%, P = 1.65 × 10-10). Eight DNMT3A mutations (.39%) were likely germline (female/male: 7/1) and 25 (.82%) likely somatic (female/male: 21/4), including 13/33 APAH-CTD participants. TPS identified CHIP in 242 PAH subjects (48% DNMT3A). DNMT3A- and all-CHIP variants were associated with PAH after correcting for age, sex, and age-CHIP interactions (odds ratio [OR]: 25.44, P = 4.50 × 10-5; OR: 23.35, P = 2.87 × 10-8, respectively). In the UK Biobank, CHIP mutations were increased in PAH (PAH = 5.35% vs. Control = 3.45%, P ≤ .0001). DNMT3A was reduced in PAH-PBMCs (area under curve [AUC] = .82) (P < .0001). Haematopoietic Dnmt3a-knockout in mice caused inflammatory PAH, which was attenuated by IL-1β antibody therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Germline DNMT3A variants and somatic variants of DNMT3A and CHIP genes increase the risk of PAH, including APAH-CTD, promote inflammation, and constitute potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207