Sudden cardiac death in newly diagnosed non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy assessed with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: the German nationwide SCD-PROTECT study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with newly diagnosed non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) or myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease (MI/CAD) face an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy initiation and up-titration. Aim is to evaluate the risk in this population by assessing sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) due to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). METHODS: All patients in Germany who received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) between December 2021 and May 2023 were enrolled in the observational multicentre SCD-PROTECT study (NCT06883383). The primary outcome was the incidence of SCA due to sustained VT/VF, measured by appropriate WCD-delivered treatments, and reported as events per 100 patient-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes included inappropriate WCD treatments, all-cause mortality, adverse events, adherence to WCD use, and heart failure medication patterns. RESULTS: In this cohort of 19 598 patients, the mean age (±standard deviation) was 58.6 ± 13.7 years for those with NICM and 64.2 ± 10.6 years for patients with MI/CAD. Female patients accounted for 23.8% of the NICM and 16.3% of the MI/CAD group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at study start was 26.9 ± 10.3% for NICM and 28.4 ± 8.0% for MI/CAD patients. The incidence rate of first appropriate treatment by WCD in NICM patients and MI/CAD patients was 6.10 (95% CI 5.31-7.00) and 8.64 (95% CI 7.41-10.05) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Overall incidence density for all appropriate treatments was 8.53 (95% CI 7.36-9.88) and 14.98 (95% CI 12.69-17.65) per 100 patient-years in the respective groups. Improvement in LVEF to >35% was observed in 53.5% of NICM patients and 51.7% of MI/CAD patients over a mean of 65.9 ± 43.8 days. 36.2% of patients were implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator at the end of WCD use. Total mortality was 0.8%. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 0.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SCD-PROTECT study highlights a substantial risk of SCA due to VT/VF during the early phase of guideline-recommended medical therapy optimization in patients with newly diagnosed reduced LVEF, regardless of ischaemic or non-ischaemic origin. The WCD provided SCD protection, the LVEF could improve to >35% in the majority of these patients and can therefore serve as risk stratification across both aetiologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".