MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413811220 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf309

Safety of tralokinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis followed for up to 4.5 years: an integrated analysis of eight clinical trials

2025· article· en· W4413811220 on OpenAlexaff
Kristian Reich, Richard G. Langley, J.F. Silvestre, D. Staumont‐Sallé, Antonio Costanzo, Andrew Pink, Amy S. Paller, Norito Katoh, Andreas Wollenberg, Richard B. Warren, Christian Bjerregård Øland, Ann‐Marie Tindberg, Le Gjerum, Eric L. Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas HospitalDalhousie University
FundersCilagLEO PharmaGaldermaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCelgeneGilead SciencesAmgenPfizerManchester Biomedical Research CentreEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsPlaceboMedicineAdverse effectIncidence (geometry)Atopic dermatitisClinical trialSafety profilePediatricsInternal medicineDermatologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) require long-term management. Understanding the long-term safety of new treatments is a top priority for patients and healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of tralokinumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD by conducting an integrated safety analysis of seven placebo-controlled trials and the ongoing, open-label extension study ECZTEND (NCT03587805). METHODS: An initial 16-week placebo-controlled (PBO-CTRL) safety set and an all-tralokinumab (ALL-TRALO) safety set combining the placebo-controlled trials and ECZTEND (data cutoff 30 April 2022) were analysed. All treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were predefined. Safety areas of clinical interest for advanced systemic AD treatments were captured retrospectively. Proportions of patients with events and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) were calculated. PYE was defined as the time until the first event or exposure end, whichever came first, and incidence was defined as the first event. RESULTS: Safety results were similar between the PBO-CTRL safety set and ALL-TRALO safety set. In the latter, 2693 patients received tralokinumab for up to 238.5 weeks (approximately 4.5 years, PYE = 5320.2). Most adverse events (AEs) were nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and occurred with similar frequencies between tralokinumab and placebo in the PBO-CTRL safety set. The most common AEs that occurred at higher rates for tralokinumab vs. placebo were nasopharyngitis [IR ratio (IRR) comparing tralokinumab vs. placebo 1.26], conjunctivitis (IRR 3.11) and injection site reaction (IRR 19.57). Dermatitis atopic and asthma occurred at lower rates with tralokinumab vs. placebo (IRR 0.51 and IRR 0.57, respectively). AESI eye disorders occurred at higher rates with tralokinumab vs. placebo (IRR 2.43) and 98% were mild to moderate. AESIs that were less frequent with tralokinumab vs. placebo included skin infections requiring systemic treatment (IRR 0.43) and eczema herpeticum (IRR 0.32). Rates of AEs of clinical interest (related to other approved systemic AD treatments) were low and similar between treatment groups. IRs of AEs did not increase with longer exposure in the ALL-TRALO safety set. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of tralokinumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD was well-tolerated and consistent with the initial placebo-controlled treatment period, with no new safety signals identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.012
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207