MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413811869 · doi:10.1007/s00464-025-12048-x

Hospital-at-home for acute complicated diverticulitis: a single-arm feasibility study

2025· article· en· W4413811869 on OpenAlexaff
Neyla Boukhili, Tiffany Paradis, Sarah Faris-Sabboobeh, Marie Demian, Nancy Morin, Carol‐Ann Vasilevsky, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Julio Faria, Allison Pang, Marylise Boutros

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgical Endoscopy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiverticular Disease and Complications
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalJewish General HospitalMcGill University
FundersSociety of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentPercutaneousEmergency medicinePhysical therapySurgeryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative management (NOM) of acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) has become the preferred approach. A Hospital-at-Home (HaH) program at our institution launched to provide NOM for ACD. This study evaluated the HaH program feasibility for well-selected patients. METHODS: Prospective single-arm single-institution non-randomized feasibility study conducted from 10/2022 to 10/2023. Patients in the Emergency Department (ED) with ACD who met inclusion criteria (> 18 years, hemodynamically stable, caregiver at home, technology proficiency, within 10 km of service center within health network) were admitted to HaH instead of hospitalization. Participants wore devices measuring vitals, were contacted by a nurse TID, and had a virtual physician visit ≥ qd. At-home phlebotomy, IV fluids/antibiotics , priority outpatient imaging, percutaneous drainage, and PICC were available. The program ended once patients met discharge criteria or were transferred to the ward for planned surgery. Primary outcome was feasibility defined as 60% of participants not requiring unplanned healthcare visits 30 days post-discharge. Secondary outcomes included descriptive data, hospital bed-days saved, and unplanned healthcare visits at 60 days. RESULTS: Of 22 patients who met inclusion criteria, 10 were enrolled. Participants were 80% male, with mean age of 56 ± 9.3 years, and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1.6 ± 1.4. CT revealed abscess (3.14 ± 1.7 cm) and extraluminal gas in 90 and 40% of participants, respectively. 70% received IV antibiotics alone, 10% required percutaneous drainage, and 20% required surgery. Of the 10, 6 had resolution without further care, 2 progressed to semi-elective surgery, and 2 failed the program for ED presentation within 7 days of discharge. The HaH program had an 80% success rate. Median length of stay was 9.5 (IQR 6.3-13) days, resulting in 98 saved hospital bed-days. CONCLUSION: Our novel HaH program for patients with ACD demonstrated feasibility with 80% of patients successfully completing it, suggesting that HaH is a viable alternative to inpatient care for ACD in well-selected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgical EndoscopySame topicDiverticular Disease and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207