MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Modified Triple Salt Monolayer Coating on Osseointegration of Endosteal Implants

2025· article· en· W4413812668 on OpenAlex
Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, J. Herbert, Bruno Luís Graciliano Silva, Sophie Kelly, Maria Castellon, Pawan Pathagamage, Estevam A. Bonfante, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G. Coelho

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNYU Grossman School of MedicineNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOsseointegrationMaterials scienceImplantBiomedical engineeringDentistryNanoindentationCoatingContext (archaeology)MedicineComposite materialSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Background: Improvements in osseointegration and bone healing as a result of surface modifications indicate that the time frame following implantation necessary to achieve biomechanical capacity for functional load-bearing may be reduced. In this context, a potassium peroxymonosulfate-based modified triple salt monolayer could potentially serve as a viable surface coating to further augment bone regenerative capabilities of endosteal implants. Methods: Implants with resorbable blast media textured surface [Tapered Pro 3DS RBT (Laser-Lok), BioHorizons] (CTRL) were treated with a potassium peroxymonosulfate-based modified triple salt coating process to generate a stabilized monolayer (Oxion). Prior to surgical intervention, implants were subjected to surface characterization. Subsequently, implants were evaluated in a large, preclinical sheep model ( n = 14 sheep). A total of 12 implants were placed bilaterally in the submandibular ramus (3 implants per group per sheep per side) and allowed to heal for 3- and 12-weeks (7 sheep per time point). Following the allocated healing time, the animals were euthanized, mandibles harvested, and samples isolated for histomorphometric and nanoindentation analysis, along with biomechanical assessment through implant lateral load testing. Results: The Oxion coated implant's surfaces yielded lower contact angle ( p < 0.001) and higher surface free energy values ( p < 0.001) relative to the CTRL surface. Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) and Bone Area Fractional Occupancy (BAFO), which were used to quantify degrees of osseointegration, were statistically homogeneous at both healing times between Oxion and CTRL surfaces. Biomechanical testing, i.e. nanoindentation and lateral loading, demonstrated improved values for Oxion implants at both early and advanced healing time points compared to CTRL ( p = 0.001). Conclusion: Implant failures continue to manifest during the initial months following implant insertion due to a variety of reasons, including inadequate osseointegration, or in cases involving clinical diseases and comorbidities. These findings suggest that the time frame following implantation necessary to achieve biomechanical capacity for functional load-bearing can be further reduced due to the Oxion surface coating in addition to the potential for enhanced early biomechanical integration relative to CTRL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it