Comparison of Factors of Spatiotemporal Variability of 7-Day Low-Flow Timing in Southern Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze the impacts of climatic, physiographic, and land use/cover factors on the spatiotemporal variability of 7-day low-flow occurrence dates for 17 rivers during the period 1950–2023 in winter and summer in southern Quebec. Regarding spatial variability, correlation analysis revealed that these occurrence dates are primarily negatively correlated with agricultural surface area (early occurrence) during both seasons. In winter, they are also negatively correlated with total rainfall and daily mean maximum temperatures, but positively correlated with forest area and mean watershed slopes. Regarding temporal variability, the application of three Mann–Kendall tests showed that in summer, 7-day low flows tend to occur late in the season due to increased rainfall, particularly in the most agricultural watersheds. In contrast, in winter, very few significant changes were observed in the long-term trend of the analyzed hydrological series. Correlation analysis using redundancy analysis between eight climate indices and the occurrence dates of 7-day low flows showed that in summer, these dates are positively correlated with the global warming climate index, while they are not correlated with any climate index in winter. This study demonstrated that the spatiotemporal variability of the occurrence dates and magnitude of 7-day low flows are not influenced by the same factors in southern Quebec, except for the global warming climate index in summer. Finally, this study shows that the timing is much less sensitive to changes in climate change than the magnitude of low flows in southern Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".