MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413831081 · doi:10.1177/20503121251356398

Maternal physical and social characteristics that influence the occurrence of preeclampsia/eclampsia and hemorrhage in Eastern Region of Ghana. A prospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4413831081 on OpenAlexaff
James Atampiiga Avoka, Elvis J. Dun-Dery, Augustine Ankomah, Agartha Ohemeng, Issah Seidu, Frederick Dun-Dery

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEclampsiaObstetricsPreeclampsiaProspective cohort studyOdds ratioPregnancyCohort studyPrenatal careCohortPopulationGynecologyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Preeclampsia/eclampsia places grave barriers to the successful reduction of maternal mortality and morbidity. These barriers have significant adverse outcomes for most women especially in sub-Saharan Africa, with Ghana contributing 88.7% of preeclampsia cases in Africa. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the maternal, physical and social characteristics that influence the occurrence of preeclampsia/eclampsia in Eastern Region of Ghana. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among pregnant women with gestational age > 28 weeks seeking antenatal care in seven hospitals in the Eastern Region of Ghana from October 2022 to March 2023. Using a simple random sampling technique, 445 patients were recruited at the antenatal care clinics using the antenatal care register as the reference point, and their delivery outcomes were evaluated after 13 weeks of follow-up. Results: The study shows that pregnant women with poor personal hygiene are 10 times the odds (aOR: 10.169, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 4.896–21.121) of developing preeclampsia/eclampsia compared to those with good personal hygiene and about five times the risk of haemorrhage (RRR: 5.12, p -value = 0.014, 95% CI: 1.393–18.815) compared to those who are normal. Those who opted for Jadelle contraceptives had 3.4 times the odds (aOR: 3.419, p = 0.028, 95% CI: 1.143–10.227) of developing preeclampsia/eclampsia compared to those who used Depo-Provera contraceptives. Women who depended on borehole as their source of drinking water were 6.95 times the odds (aOR: 6.951, p = 0.013, 95% CI: 1.511–31.981) of developing preeclampsia/eclampsia compared to those who used sachet water. Furthermore, there was statistically significant association between comorbidity conditions and haemorrhage. Conclusion: The study showed that pregnant women with poor personal hygiene were 10 times more likely to develop preeclampsia/eclampsia compared to those with good personal hygiene. The use of some family planning methods may influence the development of preeclampsia/eclampsia. Women need to seek medical advice on contraceptives before and during pregnancy before choosing contraceptives methods. Also, effective community-based health planning and services concept should be implemented to improve access to family planning services in the rural communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open MedicineSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207