MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413838465 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp19831

Identifying Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Wastewater Influent Samples

2025· article· en· W4413838465 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Olivia Sit

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastewaterBacteriaAntimicrobialMicrobiologyEnvironmental scienceBiologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a rapidly growing field of research that affects human health more than people may realize. AMR bacteria are characterized by their ability to withstand antibiotic treatment, meaning that the fatality rate of infections is much higher than with regular bacteria. The WHO predicts that AMR related deaths may surpass those caused by cancer by 2050. AMR bacteria develop due to genetic changes in the presence of antibiotics, allowing them to adapt and survive. When AMR genes are present in wastewater, it is an indicator that there may be an increase in AMR bacterial infections. Methods 50 mL samples were collected from three municipal wastewater treatment plants in Amherstview, Ravensview, and Cataraqui Bay. Total coliforms and E. coli were detected from influent samples by culturing bacteria and using colour and fluorescent indicators in a Quantitray assay. E. coli positive Quantitray wells were selected to streak isolates, and their minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined for ampicillin and carbapenem antibiotics. Alongside, the isolates underwent DNA extraction and qPCR analysis with several resistant gene targets. Implications By investigating the phenotypic and genotypic properties of wastewater samples, we can determine the level of resistant bacteria present in treated wastewater considered safe enough to return to the environment. Currently, there are AMR genes present in the final effluent samples, raising concerns about environmental and public health risks. This research shows the need for AMR bacteria removal, as current wastewater treatment does not yet focus on this. Improved strategies should ensure that AMR bacteria from discharged wastewater does not spread in the community. Detection of AMR genes and bacteria in wastewater also warns hospitals to expect more AMR bacterial infections. This builds from research during the COVID-19 pandemic where wastewater was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 to predict increases of hospitalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings→Same topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts→French-language works237,207→