MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413838724 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp19874

Tumour–Host Immunodynamics of Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG) Refractory Bladder Cancer

2025· article· en· W4413838724 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)Bladder cancerHost (biology)Bacillus (shape)BCG vaccineMedicineMicrobiologyCancerCancer researchBiologyImmunologyInternal medicineVaccinationAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Bladder cancer (BC) is dichotomized into muscle–invasive (MIBC) and non–muscle invasive (NMIBC), depending on tumour invasion across the lamina propria. Most BC patients are initially diagnosed with NMIBC. Intravesical administration of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been considered the gold standard for high–risk NMIBC following tumour surgical removal. While BCG is established as a clinically beneficial immunotherapy, around 50% of patients recur or progress into the more aggressive MIBC. We aim to better understand the molecular underpinnings of BCG–mediated immune response profiles among responders and non–responders. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from two blood draws of 16 patients with intermediate– and high–risk NMIBC, the first preceding treatment and the second following the fifth BCG installation (n = 32 samples). Patients were classified based on remission (n = 8) and recurrence (n = 8) within one year. Single–cell RNA sequencing determined immune cell type transcriptomic changes. Differential expression and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted to identify immune signatures differentiating responders from non–responders and the first (Week 1) versus last (Week 6) week of BCG management. Results: Regarding the transcriptome, an elevated metabolic response to BCG was detected in monocyte populations within responders. Particularly, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex I (mTORC1) signalling was upregulated in Week 6 compared to Week 1 within responders. Conversely, non–responders experienced downregulation of mTORC1 post–BCG. At Week 1, non–responders displayed a pre–inflammatory state that may underlie treatment resistance, marked by an upregulation of inflammatory pathways, ex. interferon (IF)–γ and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)–α. Conclusion: In NMIBC, non–responders to BCG immunotherapy display a preceding immune dysfunction characterized by metabolic and inflammatory disturbances. Pre–treatment peripheral immune profiling may effectively predict therapeutic outcomes and further personalize treatments for patients with early–stage NMIBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207