MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413843151 · doi:10.1515/ans-2023-0195

Existence and nonexistence results for a class of pseudo-parabolic equations with combined logarithmic nonlinearities

2025· article· en· W4413843151 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Zhang, Jialing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Nonlinear Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLogarithmInfinityUpper and lower boundsMathematical analysisNonlinear systemEnergy (signal processing)Initial value problemExponential functionClass (philosophy)PhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we study the existence and nonexistence results for a class of pseudo-parabolic equations with combined logarithmic nonlinearities γ | u | p- 2 u log | u | + u log | u |, where γ > 0 and p > 2 satisfy certain conditions. Employing the key ingredients in modified potential well method, we obtain the existence of a global weak solution and the finite time blow-up phenomenon for low initial energy and critical initial energy. We show that the global weak solution has exponential decay. An interesting observation is that the higher power term γ | u | p- 2 u log | u | ( p > 2) breaks the infinite time blow-up phenomenon of u log | u | with appropriate coefficient γ . Furthermore, an upper bound and a lower bound for the blow-up time are estimated. We give sufficient conditions for global existence and blow-up result of weak solutions in the case of high initial energy. Then we take account of the case when the initial energy is independent of the well depth. In addition, we show that the solution to the same pseudo-parabolic equation with only logarithmic nonlinearity u log | u | blows up at infinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Nonlinear StudiesSame topicNonlinear Partial Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207