MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413845591 · doi:10.53555/4ejg1v13

Food and Feeding Biology of a Stream dwelling Ornamental Loach Acanthocobitis botia (Hamilton, 1822) from Upper Brahmaputra Basin, North East India

2020· article· en· W4413845591 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jugendra Nath Das

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity Grants Commission
KeywordsStructural basinOrnamental plantBiologyFisheryZoologyEcologyGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The food and feeding habit of a prominent freshwater ornamental loach species Acanthocobitis botia (Hamilton, 1822) was studied based on 462 individual specimens collected from upper Brahmaputra valley region in Assam, north-east India. The mean relative length of the gut (RLG) for the species was 0.94 ± 0.02 (range 0.85 - 1.15), indicating carni-omnivorous nature of its feeding. The gastrosomatic index (GaSI) value ranged between 2.15 and 2.71with variations between different length or size groups, sexes as well as seasons. Seasonal rise and fall in the feeding intensity was also observed where pre-monsoon being the active feeding period for the species in their natural habitat. Eight different categories of food items, viz., zooplankton, small fishes, insects, crustaceans, annelids, molluscs, plant matters as well as unidentified matters were identified during gut content analysis. Of these, decaying plant matters (27.65%), insects (13.25%), small fishes (12.8%) and zooplankton (9.75%), crustaceans (6.75%) were the most important food items encountered in the guts while occurrence of molluscs (3.5%) and annelids (3.15%) were relatively low in the gut. Considerable seasonal variation in occurrence and percent composition of food items in the diet was also observed. Calculation of index of pre-ponderance (Ii) reveals decayed plant matters, small fishes, insects, crustaceans and zooplankton are the major food items for this species. A considerable variation of feeding intensity was also observed for the individuals in different maturity stages where 40% of individuals in maturing stage exhibit highest active feeding while most individuals in ripe and spent stages were with empty gut thus showed poor feeding. Short and uncoiled alimentary canal and possession of a fleshy sub-terminal (inferior) mouth also suggests towards the carni-omnivorous feeding and bottom dwelling nature of the species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207