49 A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF HEARING OUTCOMES FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS TREATED WPROTON BEAM THERAPY (PBT) IN BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION PBT is an important treatment for pediatric solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumours, minimizing off-target radiation compared to photon therapy. However, critical structures like the cochlea and vestibular organ may still undergo radiation exposure. This study examines auditory function before and after PBT in pediatric cancer patients in BC over 20 years. METHODS Medical records from BC Children’s Hospital were reviewed for patients diagnosed with cancer at age <=20 years between 2001-2021, who were treated with curative-intent PBT and received audiology assessments. Auditory function at three time points (baseline, end of therapy, and most recent follow-up) was analyzed using Fisher’s and Wilcoxon rank sum exact tests. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Among 49 children (55.1% male), 77.6% had CNS tumours, primarily ependymoma (31.6%) and intracranial germ cell tumours (23.7%). Median ages at diagnosis and PBT initiation were 8.8 and 9.4 years, respectively. 56.5% developed SNHL following treatment, with early PBT (p=0.046) or platinum-based chemotherapy (p=0.019) before age five increasing risk. Frequencies >2000 Hz were most affected, with most cases (45% left ears, 52% right ears) classified as grade 1 hearing loss per SIOP Boston criteria. One-year SNHL probability was 43.5%. CONCLUSIONS Children receiving PBT still suffer from SNHL, especially in those receiving PBT and platinum-therapy before age five. SNHL may impact speech and language development in this age group. Regular audiology management is warranted in all children receiving treatment. Other risk factors for ototoxicity, including genetic susceptibility, will be explored further.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".