MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413860442 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103447

Physical morbidities in survivors of testicular germ cell tumors during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood: a population-based retrospective matched cohort study

2025· article· en· W4413860442 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rand Ajaj, Cindy Lau, Sumit Gupta, Nancy N. Baxter, Jason D. Pole, Furqan Shaikh, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersInstitut canadien d'information sur la santéTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyInstitute of Biomedical ScienceOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyYoung adultCohortPediatricsCohort studyTesticular Germ Cell TumorPopulationGerm cellTesticular cancerGerontologyInternal medicineCancerEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background While testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) survival exceeds 90%, many survivors of adult TGCT are at risk for treatment toxicities. Less is known about physical morbidities in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with TGCT. Methods We used the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System, the Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Therapy, and the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all CAYA males diagnosed with TGCT from 1992 to 2021 at age 11–21 years in Ontario, Canada. We matched patients at TGCT diagnosis (one-to-five ratio) to cancer-free males from the general Ontario population who were identified from the Registered Person Database. We linked CAYA to health administrative databases to identify subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMN) and hearing loss/aid use after TGCT diagnosis. We assessed cardiovascular disease (CVD), dialysis, and kidney transplant that occurred early effect ) and ≥five years ( late effect ) from TGCT diagnosis. We used the cumulative incidence function and cause-specific hazard models. Findings We identified 748 patients (404 chemotherapy-treated) and 3740 controls. Median age at diagnosis was 19.0 years [interquartile range (IQR): 18.0–21.0] and 29.7 years (IQR: 25.0–37.6) at the end of follow-up. Chemotherapy-treated patients had higher risk than controls for non-TGCT SMN [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.8–11.4], hearing loss/aid (HR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8–4.2), early dialysis (HR = 7.7, 95% CI: 1.3–46.8), any early CVD (HR = 7.3, 95% CI: 4.1–13.0), and any late CVD (HR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4), particularly late stroke (HR = 7.4, 95% CI: 1.2–44.6). Compared to their controls, non-chemotherapy-treated patients had higher risk for late dialysis (HR = 10.5, 95% CI: 1.1–103.8), and lower risk for late hypertension (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–1.0). Non-chemotherapy-treated patients had higher cumulative incidence of second contralateral TGCT than chemotherapy-treated patients (15-year incidence=4.6% vs. 0.9%, p=0.0049). Interpretation Chemotherapy-treated CAYA with TGCT are at elevated risks for non-TGCT SMN, hearing loss, and early CVD compared to the general population. The long latency for certain outcome risks indicate further research is needed to characterize the health outcomes of these survivors as they age. Funding Foundation grants-Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario Graduate Scholarship-University of Toronto, and Research Training Competition (RESTRACOMP) award-The Hospital for Sick Children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207