Effects of volenrelaxin in worsening heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 randomized trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Relaxin is a peptide hormone that may decrease circulatory congestion and improve kidney function. In this study, we conducted a double-blind, international, multicenter trial to test whether volenrelaxin, a long-acting form of human relaxin, can improve left atrial (LA) function, reduce congestion and improve kidney function in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We randomly assigned patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV HFpEF and recent heart failure (HF) decompensation to 25-mg, 50-mg or 100-mg volenrelaxin or placebo administered subcutaneously once weekly. The primary outcome was the change in LA reservoir strain at 26 weeks, with key secondary endpoints including changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and safety. The trial was stopped early by the sponsor because of evidence for worsening congestion after 332 participants had been enrolled (mean age 74 years, 49% women, mean body mass index 30.6 kg m − 2 , 31.9% NYHA class III–IV). Compared to placebo, 25-mg volenrelaxin improved LA reservoir strain (+3.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–6.6, P = 0.006) but did not have effects on this outcome at 50-mg (+1.3%, 95% CI: −1.3 to 3.9, P = 0.332) or 100-mg (+0.9%, 95% CI: −1.8 to 3.6, P = 0.521) doses. At 26 weeks, volenrelaxin (pooling all dosages) increased NT-proBNP levels (+24.5%, 95% CI: 2.0–51.8) and had no significant effect on eGFR (+2.2 ml min −1 1.73 m − 2 , 95% CI: −1.8 to 6.3). Volenrelaxin was also associated with a non-significant increase in risk for HF hospitalization compared to placebo (hazard ratio = 2.64, 95% CI: 0.93–7.56, P = 0.070), along with signals for an increased number of cardiovascular and renal serious adverse events (odds ratio = 2.52, 95% CI: 0.95–6.68, P = 0.056). In conclusion, despite some evidence for improvement in LA function at a low dose, treatment with this long-acting form of human relaxin was associated with worsening congestion in patients with recently decompensated HFpEF. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05592275 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".