MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413868480 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.18351

Differences in Risk Factors for Severe Preeclampsia and <scp>HELLP</scp> Syndrome in Singleton Versus Twin Pregnancies: A Population‐Based Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4413868480 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mackenzie Campbell, Johanna Koegl, Jeffrey N. Bone, Sofia Nicolls, Janet Lyons, Chantal Mayer, Kenneth Lim, Julie van Schalkwyk, K.S. Joseph, Sarka Lisonkova

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBC Children's HospitalFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia
KeywordsHELLP syndromeMedicineObstetricsOdds ratioPreeclampsiaPregnancyPopulationGestational diabetesBody mass indexEclampsiaGynecologyGestationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the associations between pre-pregnancy risk factors and severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (SPE) and/or HELLP syndrome differ between singleton and twin pregnancies. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: British Columbia (BC), Canada. POPULATION: All pregnancies with singletons or twins that resulted in a stillbirth or live birth at ≥ 20 weeks' gestation from 2008/09 to 2020/21. METHODS: Data were obtained from the BC Perinatal Database Registry. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between each risk factor for SPE/HELLP (e.g., body-mass-index (BMI), in vitro-fertilisation (IVF), chronic hypertension, and diabetes) and the modifying effect of plurality by including interaction terms between these risk factors and plurality in the model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, and/or HELLP syndrome. RESULTS: Among 563 252 pregnancies (8841 twin, 554 411 singleton), the rate of SPE/HELLP was 4.7 per 1000 singleton pregnancies and 31.1 per 1000 twin pregnancies (relative risk 6.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.84-7.49). Older maternal age (≥ 35 years), nulliparity, pre-pregnancy and gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, prior mental health problems, substance use during pregnancy, and prior stillbirth increased the odds, while smoking decreased the odds of SPE/HELLP among both singleton and twin pregnancies. However, the adjusted associations between BMI, IVF, prior abortions, and SPE/HELLP differed by plurality (interaction p-values 0.002, < 0.0001, and 0.04, respectively). IVF was associated with increased odds of SPE/HELLP in singleton pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.93; 95% CI 1.64-2.27) but not in twins (aOR 0.85; CI 0.65-1.11). Similarly, overweight BMI was associated with elevated odds in singleton pregnancies (aOR 1.47; CI 1.32-1.64) but not in twins (aOR 0.86; CI 0.59-1.25), as was obese BMI (singleton aOR 1.88; CI 1.67-2.12; twin aOR 0.80; CI 0.51-1.24). Conversely, a history of prior abortions was associated with decreased odds in twin pregnancies (aOR 0.70; CI 0.54-0.92) but not singleton pregnancies (aOR 0.95; CI 0.88-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: High BMI and IVF are associated with elevated risk of SPE/HELLP syndrome in singleton pregnancies, but not in twin pregnancies. This study provides insights regarding SPE/HELLP syndrome among singleton and twin pregnancies, and useful information for pre-pregnancy counselling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207