MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413871655 · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2025.05.543

63285 Bimekizumab efficacy by patient subgroups in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: 2-year phase 3 results from BE HEARD EXT

2025· article· en· W4413871655 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Sayed, Martina L. Porter, Georgios Kokolakis, Philippe Guillem, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Vincent Piguet, Sayaka Yamaguchi, Bartosz Lukowski, Robert Rolleri, Sarah Kavanagh, Antonio Martorell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidradenitis suppurativaMedicineDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Response to hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment can vary depending on patient characteristics, necessitating new treatments with consistent efficacy.1 Bimekizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A registered for the treatment of HS.2 Here, we report bimekizumab efficacy outcomes across different subgroups in patients with moderate to severe HS over 3 years. We aim to assess the maintenance of clinical response over 3 years with bimekizumab by age, sex, disease duration, Hurley Stage, and body mass index (BMI). Procedure/Study Data were pooled from the BE HEARD I&II (BHI&II) studies and their open-label extension, BE HEARD EXT (BHEXT).3,4 Proportions of patients achieving ≥50%/75% HiSCR (HiSCR50/75) in subgroups (age [<35years, ≥35years], sex, disease duration at baseline [<5.02years, ≥5.02years (median)], Hurley Stage [II, III], BMI [<30kg/m2, 30–<35kg/m2, ≥35kg/m2]) are reported at Year1 (Week48) and Year3 (Week148). Data reported for patients randomized to bimekizumab from baseline (Bimekizumab Total) in BHI&II who entered BHEXT (observed case). Results 657 BHI&II completers entered BHEXT; 556 received bimekizumab from baseline. Overall, a high proportion of patients reached HiSCR50/75 at Year1 (n=444/556 [79.9%]/n=356/556[64.0%]) and Year3 (n=331/367[90.2%]/n=298/367[81.2%]). High proportions of patients reached HiSCR50/75 across subgroups at Year1: <35years, 80.5%/65.2%, ≥35years, 79.2%/63.0%; male, 80.5%/63.4%, female, 79.3%/64.5%; median disease duration <5.02years, 83.2%/66.3%, ≥5.02years, 76.4%/61.6%; Hurley Stage II, 83.5%/69.6%, Hurley Stage III, 75.5%/57.3%; BMI <30kg/m2, 81.2%/67.9%, BMI 30–<35kg/m2, 81.3%/63.4%, BMI ≥35kg/m2, 77.1%/59.6%. At Year3, proportions reaching HiSCR50/75 were further increased or maintained across subgroups: <35years, 91.7%/83.4%, ≥35years, 88.9%/79.3%; male, 89.3%/78.5%, female, 91.1%/83.7%; median disease duration <5.02years, 89.9%/80.9%, ≥5.02years, 90.5%/81.5%; Hurley Stage II, 87.5%/81.7%, Hurley Stage III, 88.5%/80.6%, BMI <30kg/m2, 92.0%/81.5%, BMI 30–<35kg/m2, 87.2%/80.2%, BMI ≥35kg/m2, 89.9%/81.5%. Conclusion Patients treated with bimekizumab demonstrated efficacy in all subgroups with improvements in clinical response maintained over 3 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of DermatologySame topicHidradenitis Suppurativa and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207