MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413874723 · doi:10.4103/sjg.sjg_199_25

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease management in Saudi Arabia: A modified Delphi-based adaptation of international standards

2025· article· en· W4413874723 on OpenAlexaff
Faisal Abaalkhail, Faisal M. Sanai, Khalid Alswat, Adnan Alzanbagi, Ahmed Al‐Jedai, Ali Alshehri, Assim A. Alfadda, Hamdan S. Alghamdi, Majid A. Almadi, Mohammad AlEissa, Mona Ismail, Saud Alsifri, Turki Alzahrani, Saleh A. Alqahtani, Waleed Al Hamoudi

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersNovo Nordisk
KeywordsMedicineNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseSteatohepatitisInternal medicineMetabolic syndromeReferralLiver diseaseFatty liverIntensive care medicineDiseaseFamily medicineObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reclassification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) marks a significant shift in understanding liver disease, particularly in Saudi Arabia, where metabolic disorders are highly prevalent. This study aimed to develop expert consensus recommendations for early detection, specialist referral, and management of MASLD/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in Saudi Arabia. A modified Delphi process was used to establish consensus among an expert panel of 15 multidisciplinary specialists, including hepatologists, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, and primary care physicians. The panel addressed six key areas: terminology and epidemiology, screening, risk categories, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, first-line treatment, and advanced therapeutic options. A literature review spanning January 2011 to May 2024 informed evidence-based recommendations, assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. The consensus established screening criteria for high-risk groups, emphasizing noninvasive tests (NITs) such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Risk stratification thresholds were defined: FIB-4 ≥2.67, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) >12 kPa, and MRE >5.0 kPa indicate advanced fibrosis requiring specialist referral. Treatment recommendations emphasized a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy (including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 [SGLT2] inhibitors, and pioglitazone), and surgical interventions when appropriate. Bariatric surgery was recommended for eligible patients with noncirrhotic MASLD. This consensus provides evidence-based guidance for MASLD/MASH management in Saudi Arabia, highlighting early detection through NITs, risk-stratified care pathways, and multidisciplinary treatment strategies essential for improving patient outcomes in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaudi Journal of GastroenterologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207