Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease management in Saudi Arabia: A modified Delphi-based adaptation of international standards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reclassification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) marks a significant shift in understanding liver disease, particularly in Saudi Arabia, where metabolic disorders are highly prevalent. This study aimed to develop expert consensus recommendations for early detection, specialist referral, and management of MASLD/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in Saudi Arabia. A modified Delphi process was used to establish consensus among an expert panel of 15 multidisciplinary specialists, including hepatologists, endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, and primary care physicians. The panel addressed six key areas: terminology and epidemiology, screening, risk categories, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, first-line treatment, and advanced therapeutic options. A literature review spanning January 2011 to May 2024 informed evidence-based recommendations, assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. The consensus established screening criteria for high-risk groups, emphasizing noninvasive tests (NITs) such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Risk stratification thresholds were defined: FIB-4 ≥2.67, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) >12 kPa, and MRE >5.0 kPa indicate advanced fibrosis requiring specialist referral. Treatment recommendations emphasized a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy (including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists [GLP-1 RA], sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 [SGLT2] inhibitors, and pioglitazone), and surgical interventions when appropriate. Bariatric surgery was recommended for eligible patients with noncirrhotic MASLD. This consensus provides evidence-based guidance for MASLD/MASH management in Saudi Arabia, highlighting early detection through NITs, risk-stratified care pathways, and multidisciplinary treatment strategies essential for improving patient outcomes in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.254 | 0.162 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".