MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413874845 · doi:10.3390/children12091156

Intranasal Fentanyl in Preterm Infants Undergoing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement (INFENT PICC): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4413874845 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Najla Tabbara, Shelley McLeod, Anna Taddio, Vibhuti Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPeripherally inserted central catheterMedicineFentanylAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialCatheterSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are subjected to clinically essential painful procedures including peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. Pharmacological interventions are inconsistently used for procedural analgesia due to concerns of adverse events. Intranasal (IN) fentanyl is a promising pharmacological alternative that delivers rapid targeted analgesia. The objectives of this blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) were to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive RCT of IN fentanyl for PICC placement in preterm infants and evaluate the acceptability and adoption of IN fentanyl for procedural pain management in the NICU. Methods: Infants admitted to the NICU (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto) with a gestational age (GA) at birth < 32 weeks undergoing their first PICC placement were randomized to IN fentanyl or placebo as an add-on to standard of care. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment and completeness of data collection for pain assessment. The pre-specified targets were recruitment of 24 participants and at least 80% of video-recordings being suitable for pain assessment. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, and IN fentanyl acceptability and adoption by healthcare providers. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06590870). Results: Between August 2024 and January 2025, 16 parents/guardians were approached resulting in eight enrollments for a consent rate of 50% (95% CI 28, 72). The target recruitment of 24 participants was not achieved. Out of six infants that received study interventions, all video-recordings were suitable for pain assessment by outcome assessors with a success rate of 100% (95% CI 61, 100). There were no adverse events. Fifteen healthcare providers completed the survey and reported acceptability of IN fentanyl but barriers with its adoption in clinical practice. Conclusions: Major modifications to the recruitment strategy would be required to progress to a definitive RCT. Strategies facilitating IN fentanyl adoption for procedural analgesia in the NICU are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildrenSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207