Measuring breakfast dietary patterns in Spanish youth: Reliability of the Spanish Youth Breakfast Consumption Questionnaire (SYBC-Q)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Reliable tools to assess breakfast habits are essential, as breakfast quality is linked to health and development in youth. However, validated instruments for Spanish children and adolescents are scarce. Objectives: To assess the reliability of the Spanish Youth Breakfast Consumption Questionnaire (SYBC-Q) in a sample of Spanish children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 248 young people participated in the study: 77 children (46.8% girls; 10.7 ± 0.7 years) and 171 adolescents (50.3% girls; 14.1 ± 1.7 years). They completed the questionnaire twice, 14 days apart, on the same days of the week and schedule. The tool includes 21 items grouped into seven food categories and two breakfast quality scores. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the kappa coefficient (κ) and Spearman's correlation (Rho). Analyses were performed separately by age group and gender. Results: Children showed an acceptable to good level of agreement and a moderate to high correlation between test and retest (κ: 0.23–0.71; Rho: 0.37–0.76). However, low agreement and poor correlation were found for ‘Take Cheese’ and ‘Take Milk dessert’ in girls (both, κ < 0.20; Rho < 0.30). Adolescents presented an acceptable to perfect level of agreement and a low to high correlation between test and retest (κ: 0.24–0.82; Rho: 0.24–0.82), but a low level of agreement in the items ‘Take pâte’ in girls and ‘Take dried fruits’ in boys (both, κ: < 0.20; Rho: < 0.30). Conclusion: Overall, the SYBC-Q is a reliable tool for assessing the breakfast consumption and quality in Spanish children and adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it