MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413878185 · doi:10.3171/2025.6.focus25432

Muscle pad interposition technique in microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm: a single-center case series and systematic review

2025· review· en· W4413878185 on OpenAlexaff
Riccardo Draghi, Francesco Tengattini, Francesco Travaglini, Francesco Salomi, Diego Sangiorgi, Ignazio Borghesi, Fabio Calbucci

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgical FOCUS · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemifacial spasmMedicineMicrovascular decompressionSurgerySingle CenterDecompressionFacial nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a rare neurological condition characterized by involuntary contractions of hemifacial mimic muscles. Microvascular decompression (MVD) with the interposition technique, in which a Teflon spacer is inserted between the nerve and the offending vessel, is the most commonly used treatment. However, the authors' institution has used autologous muscle pledgets for more than 15 years as an alternative spacer material, with satisfactory results. They report a single-center study of 75 consecutive patients treated with interposition MVD using autologous muscle pledgets between November 2012 and March 2023. METHODS: All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Surgical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese grading system of Kondo and colleagues, which evaluates both the efficacy of surgery and complications. Furthermore, a systematic review of recent series on HFS treated by the interposition technique was done, to compare the present study results and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients, 31 (41.3%) were male, the median age was 52 years, and the median duration of the disease was 5 years. In 51 patients (68.0%), the neurovascular conflict (NVC) was due to single-vessel compression, while multiple vessels were found in 24 cases (32.0%). Complete resolution of HFS was achieved in 84% of patients, with an additional 6.7% reporting occasional mild spasms. Delayed resolution occurred in 18.7% of cases, typically within 30 days postsurgery. The overall complication rate was low, with 8.0% experiencing hearing deficits and 1.3% reporting persistent dysphonia. According to the Japanese grading system, excellent results (complete disappearance of HFS and no complications) were obtained in 62 patients (82.7%) and good results in 7 (9.3%). Involvement of the vertebral artery (VA) was associated with poorer outcomes, with a significant reduction in achieving complete resolution (OR 0.23, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Interposition MVD using autologous muscle pads represents an effective and durable treatment for HFS, particularly when the offending vessel is not a large-caliber artery, such as the VA or basilar artery (BA). The present study results are in line with those of the best series evaluating long-term resolution of the spasm and surgical complications. Despite a limited rate of recurrences, the described technique provides a high rate of spasm resolution, minimal complications, and high patient satisfaction. In the case of an NVC near the VA or BA, interposition with stiffer materials or the transposition technique may ensure a higher rate of HFS control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgical FOCUSSame topicTrigeminal Neuralgia and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207