MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413883399 · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102946

Switch to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in people living with HIV aged 65 years or older: BICOLDER study – IMEA 057

2025· article· en· W4413883399 on OpenAlexaff
Minh Lê, Clotilde Allavena, Véronique Joly, Lambert Assoumou, Valentina Isernia, Faïza Ajana, D. Neau, Diane Descamps, Charlotte Charpentier, Aı̈da Benalychérif, Bao Phung, Gilles Peytavin, Roland Landman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Infection and Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersGilead Sciences
KeywordsTenofovir alafenamideEmtricitabineTenofovirHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineGerontologyVirologyAntiretroviral therapyViral load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Polymedication and comorbidities are frequent in aging people with HIV (PWH) and often associated with elevated incidences of adverse events (AEs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and practicality of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), an antiretroviral (ARV) therapy with limited DDIs, in an elderly virologically-controlled PWH population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was prospective, multicentric, single-arm conducted in HIV-1 controlled PWH aged over 65 years who switched from a ritonavir- or cobicistat-boosted containing regimen to B/F/TAF. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week24. Secondary endpoints included biological endpoints and co-morbidity (Charlson) and frailty (Fried) scores. Median (IQR) results are presented. RESULTS: 24 participants aged 69 years (67-73), 79.2 % Caucasian, were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis. 75 % of participants were receiving an elvitegravir/cobicistat based regimen. At week24 and week48, 91.7 % of participants maintained a plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL. Study treatment was discontinued in one participant due to virologic failure at week12, possibly related to adherence issues following AE. Drug-related AEs were reported in 6 participants, with one discontinuation at week4 (nightmare/mood disorder). No life-threatening AEs or deaths were reported. No significant modifications from baseline were reported in weight, co-morbidities, kidney parameters, cardiovascular risk or frailty scores at W48. A mild decrease of total cholesterol and triglycerides was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that B/F/TAF is both safe and effective for elderly PWH patients with a prolonged and documented history of HIV infection, multiple co-morbidities and concomitant medication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Infection and Public HealthSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207