MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413883652 · doi:10.1111/1365-2478.70074

Seismic Imaging of the Southern Vienna Basin (Austria) Using Probabilistic Ambient‐Noise Tomography

2025· article· en· W4413883652 on OpenAlexaff
Clément Estève, Yang Lu, Jeremy M. Gosselin, Richard S. Kramer, Götz Bokelmann, Gregor Götzl

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Prospecting · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyTomographyTelmatologyRegional geologyStructural basinNoise (video)Economic geologyAmbient noise levelPaleontologyGeomorphologyTectonicsRadiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Surface‐wave ambient noise tomography has proven to be a cost‐effective and reliable tool for imaging sedimentary basins when coupled with dense nodal seismic arrays. Here, we deployed 181 seismic nodes in two asynchronous phases across the southern Vienna Basin in spring 2024. We retrieve fundamental‐mode Rayleigh and Love wave group velocity dispersion curves from seismic noise cross‐correlations. We then obtained a pseudo three‐dimensional (3D) model and a seismic radial anisotropy () model of the area from a 2‐step approach that employs trans‐dimensional probabilistic (Bayesian) inference. The 3D model highlights the structure of the Neogene basin. The 3D seismic radial anisotropy reveals several patterns, which may help constrain the presence and nature of faults and geologic fabrics in the study area. Combined, these models constrain first‐order features of the basin structure that will be useful for planning further geothermal exploration. In particular, this work guides future detailed, spatially targeted two‐dimensional/3D seismic reflection surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical ProspectingSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207