Atherosclerosis increases adventitial pressure and limits solute transport via fluid-balance mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adventitia of blood vessels is their structural interface with surrounding tissues and may also contribute importantly to atherogenesis. Adventitial vasa vasorum and lymphatic vessels provide sources and sinks of interstitial fluid and solutes and remodel in disease. We constructed a mathematical model to investigate how soluble disease mediators, including lipoproteins and cytokines, are transported through the artery wall in healthy and atherosclerotic conditions. We derived model parameters from in vivo measurements where possible and extensively investigated the sensitivity of fluid flow and solute transport to them. Adventitial interstitial fluid pressure is predicted to increase in atherosclerosis because of a shift in transmural fluxes across vasa vasorum and lymphatics. In healthy conditions, 40-80% of the fluid gathered by lymphatics originates from vasa vasorum, and this increases to 60-90% in atherosclerosis. The increased dilution of fluid flowing from the inner layers in atherosclerosis implies that solute transport from the media to the adventitia is impaired. This implies increased concentration gradients near the external elastic lamina that may increase immune-cell retention there, and decreased gradients in the outer adventitia that may reduce immune-cell attraction from there.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".