MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413885186 · doi:10.1080/21650373.2025.2551637

Investigation of calcium leaching deformation and damage in cement-based materials

2025· article· en· W4413885186 on OpenAlexaff
Yuting Chu, Peng Gao, Yang Yu, Cun Wang, Hao Ding, Binggen Zhan, Qijun Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCementLeaching (pedology)Materials scienceCalciumDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialMetallurgyGeotechnical engineeringGeologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional length measurement methods are difficult to quantify the local deformation and damage in cement-based materials caused by calcium leaching. In this study, Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was employed to quantify local deformation and damage, while Lattice fracture model was utilized to investigate the initiation and propagation of microcracks. The results showed that the bulk shrinkage deformation characterized by DIC was consistent with the data measured by the length comparator. Higher W/C ratio leads to increased shrinkage. The effect of sample types on shrinkage follows this order: cement paste > mortar > concrete. The calcium leaching damage factor in concrete can reach 148.4 μm·m−1 after leaching for 42 d, with damage being more severe on the surface and gradually decreasing toward the interior. A strong correlation was observed between the simulated microcracks and the damage field, as well as between the total microcrack area and the calcium leaching damage factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable Cement-Based MaterialsSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207