MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413889000 · doi:10.1364/oe.572296

Static DFOS: pushing towards the limits of chirped-pulse phase-sensitive OTDR

2025· article· en· W4413889000 on OpenAlexaff
Amaury Autric, Alexandre Goy, Etienne Rochat

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa Skills and Simulation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsPhase (matter)Pulse (music)Optical time-domain reflectometerSelf-phase modulationMaterials scienceOptical fiberNonlinear opticsPhysicsFiber optic sensorPolarization-maintaining optical fiberDetectorLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry (Φ-OTDR) techniques allow for distributed measurements of various physical quantities involving local optical path variations along optical fibers, typically in response to either strain or temperature changes. Chirped-pulse (CP) Φ-OTDR being a relative measurement, errors on the integrated signal accumulate in time, thus degrading slowly varying temperature measurements. This can be solved by performing a mapping of the fiber's Rayleigh scattering as a function of wavelength, which provides an absolute frame of reference for strain and temperature changes. However, previously assumed limitations required using impractically high wavelength tuning resolutions. In this paper, relying on a theoretical description, supported by numerical simulations and experiments, we show that this apparent limit of CP-Φ-OTDR is only noise related and can be overcome thanks to the spectral content of the chirp. This paves the way for industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207