MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413889381 · doi:10.1115/1.4069640

On Particulate Taylor-Couette Flow Driven by Periodically Oscillating Cylinders

2025· article· en· W4413889381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTaylor–Couette flowMechanicsParticulatesFlow (mathematics)Couette flowPhysicsClassical mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oscillatory laminar Taylor-Couette (TC) flow of a particle-laden fluid between two periodically oscillating cylinders is studied under the assumption that the time-averaged value of particle volume fraction remain essentially constant with the time-periodic small-amplitude oscillation of particles around their initial positions. Unlike oscillatory Taylor-Couette flow of a clear fluid governed by a linear equation for the azimuthal velocity field alone, it is shown here that oscillatory particulate Taylor-Couette flow governed by coupled nonlinear equations for the azimuthal and radial velocity fields gives rise to the nonzero radial velocity field of dispersed particles which contains a nonperiodic steady component. Explicit expressions are derived for the leading-order azimuthal and radial velocity fields of the suspension and dispersed particles. Assuming that the radii of cylinders are much larger than the thickness of Stokes boundary layer, detailed results are demonstrated for the case of a single oscillating cylinder and the case of oscillating inner cylinder with fixed outer cylinder. It is shown that the steady radial velocity of particles is vanishingly low except in a thin boundary layer of the oscillating cylinder, and the direction of steady radial velocity of particles is determined by whether the particles are heavier or lighter than the carrier fluid. Unlike known works on particulate Taylor-Couette flow driven by uniformly rotating cylinders, the results reported here could offer new insight to oscillatory particulate Taylor-Couette flow driven by periodically oscillating cylinders with non-neutrally buoyant particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it