MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413893866 · doi:10.4081/cardio.2025.80

Lipoprotein(a): what clinicians need to know

2025· article· en· W4413893866 on OpenAlex
Laibah Arshad Khan, Muhammad Farhan Hanif, Ahmed Mustafa Rashid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeed to knowMedicineIntensive care medicineComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a plasma particle structurally similar to LDL, distinguished by the presence of apolipoprotein(a), and has evolved from plasminogen. Lp(a) concentration is 90% genetically determined and largely stable throughout life. Black individuals exhibit the highest Lp(a) levels, followed by South Asians, Whites, Hispanics, and East Asians, with a 2- to 4-fold median difference across ancestral groups. Approximately 1.5 billion people worldwide (~20% of the population) have elevated Lp(a) levels (>125 nmol/L or >50 mg/dL). Notably, women experience 17% higher levels than men post-menopause. Mendelian randomization studies have established Lp(a) as a strong cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, implicated in coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease (PAD), ischemic stroke, heart failure, and aortic stenosis. Risk increases linearly with Lp(a) levels, with concentrations >90 mg/dL (>190 nmol/L) associated with a 1.6-fold higher risk of ischemic stroke, 1.7-fold for heart failure, 2-fold for PAD, and 3-fold for aortic stenosis and myocardial infarction. Lp(a) levels between 130–391 mg/dL (280–849 nmol/L) confer atherosclerotic CVD risk equivalent to familial hypercholesterolemia. Universal screening of once Lp(a) test is now recommended for all adults in guidelines across the US, Europe and Canada. However, Lp(a) testing is severely underutilized with studies showing 0.3% testing frequency amongst 5.5 million US patients. Even in high-risk patients with established ASCVD, only 13.9% are tested for Lp(a). Existing treatment options for elevated Lp(a) include proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis. Emerging therapies include antisense oligonucleotides such as pelacarsen, small-interfering RNA such as zerlasiran, olpasiran, and lepodisiran, and oral agents such as muvalaplin. These medications have shown a significant reduction in plasma levels up to 80% (pelacarsen), 96.9% (olpasiran), 97% (lepodisiran) and 99% (zerlasiran) in phase 1 and 2 trials, with larger studies ongoing to assess cardiovascular outcomes. With advancing therapies, clinician awareness, early detection, and risk management of Lp(a) are critical to improving outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it