MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413895136 · doi:10.1007/s12020-025-04402-9

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in neonates and children born SGA. A systematic review and metanalysis

2025· review· en· W4413895136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kalliopi Kissoudi, Christos Chatzakis, Panagiotis Mastorakos, Maria Papagianni, Alexandros Sotiriadis, George Mastorakos

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens
KeywordsLipid metabolismCarbohydrate metabolismDiabetes mellitusMedicinePediatricsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a marker of adverse intrauterine environment and is associated with metabolic disorders in adulthood. The present metanalysis compares the carbohydrate and lipid metabolism between neonates and pre- and post- pubertal children born SGA and their appropriate for gestational age (AGA) -born peers. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify observational studies comparing carbohydrate and lipidemic profiles in neonates and children born SGA vs. AGA. Data were extracted on insulin, glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentration. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I² statistic and Egger’s test, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies (N = 8453) were analyzed. SGA neonates had greater triglycerides (SMD: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19–0.63) and lower HDL cholesterol (SMD: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.13) concentration than AGA neonates. Prepubertal children born SGA showed significantly greater insulin concentration (SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.10–0.57) than those born AGA. No significant differences were found between AGA and SGA neonates, pre- and post-pubertal children in glucose and LDL cholesterol concentration. CONCLUSION: Neonates born SGA show greater circulating triglycerides and lower HDL concentration compared to their AGA peers, while prepubertal children born SGA show greater circulating insulin concentration, potentially predisposing them to insulin resistance. These findings showcase the long-term metabolic consequences of adverse intrauterine conditions, which result to SGA offspring, and emphasize the importance of monitoring SGA neonates and children for potential metabolic disorders during their life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.038
Bibliometrics0.0120.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrineSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207