MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413895136 · doi:10.1007/s12020-025-04402-9

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in neonates and children born SGA. A systematic review and metanalysis

2025· review· en· W4413895136 on OpenAlex
Kalliopi Kissoudi, Christos Chatzakis, Panagiotis Mastorakos, Maria Papagianni, Alexandros Sotiriadis, George Mastorakos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens
KeywordsLipid metabolismCarbohydrate metabolismDiabetes mellitusMedicinePediatricsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is a marker of adverse intrauterine environment and is associated with metabolic disorders in adulthood. The present metanalysis compares the carbohydrate and lipid metabolism between neonates and pre- and post- pubertal children born SGA and their appropriate for gestational age (AGA) -born peers. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify observational studies comparing carbohydrate and lipidemic profiles in neonates and children born SGA vs. AGA. Data were extracted on insulin, glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentration. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I² statistic and Egger’s test, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies (N = 8453) were analyzed. SGA neonates had greater triglycerides (SMD: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19–0.63) and lower HDL cholesterol (SMD: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.13) concentration than AGA neonates. Prepubertal children born SGA showed significantly greater insulin concentration (SMD: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.10–0.57) than those born AGA. No significant differences were found between AGA and SGA neonates, pre- and post-pubertal children in glucose and LDL cholesterol concentration. CONCLUSION: Neonates born SGA show greater circulating triglycerides and lower HDL concentration compared to their AGA peers, while prepubertal children born SGA show greater circulating insulin concentration, potentially predisposing them to insulin resistance. These findings showcase the long-term metabolic consequences of adverse intrauterine conditions, which result to SGA offspring, and emphasize the importance of monitoring SGA neonates and children for potential metabolic disorders during their life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it