Antibacterial Resin Composites with Sustained Chlorhexidine Release: One-Year In Vitro Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The addition of chlorhexidine in dental restorative materials is a promising strategy to reduce the recurrence of tooth decay lesions. However, the main challenge is to develop materials with antimicrobial activity in the long term. Objective: This study analyses the effect of filler type and concentration of resin composites supplemented with chlorhexidine loaded in carrier montmorillonite particles (MMT/CHX) regarding their chemical, physical, and short- and long-term antimicrobial proprieties. Materials: Experimental composites were synthesized with 0, 30, or 60% filler in two ratios, 70/30 and 80/20, of barium glass/colloidal silica, respectively, and 5 wt% MMT/CHX. Conversion was measured using near Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry. Sorption and solubility were determined by specimen weight before and after drying and immersing in water. Flexural strength (FS) and elastic modulus (E) were determined by three bending tests using a universal test machine. Chlorhexidine release was monitored for 50 days. Streptococcus mutans UA159 was used in all microbiological assays. Inhibition halo assay was performed for 12 months and, also, biofilm growth for the specimens and colony-forming unit (CFU). Remineralization assay was used on restored teeth using measurements of microhardness Knoop and CFUs. Results: Conversion, sorption, and solubility were not affected by filler type and concentration. FS and E increase with the filler concentration, independent from filler type. Chlorhexidine was significantly released for 15 days for all experimental materials, and the increase in filler concentration decreased its release. Halo inhibition was observed for a longer time (12 months) in materials with 60 wt% filler at 70/30 proportion. Also, 60 wt% filler materials, independent from the filler ratio, reduced the CFU in relation to the control group from 8 to 12 months. In the remineralization assay, besides the absence of differences in hardness among the groups, after biofilm growth, the CFU was also significantly lower in materials with 60 wt% filler. Conclusions: Materials with 60% filler, preferentially with 70% barium glass and 30% silica, and 5% MMT/CHX particles demonstrated long-term antimicrobial activity, reaching 12 months of effectiveness. Also, this formulation was associated with higher mechanical properties and similar conversion, sorption, and solubility compared to the other materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".