Urban and Kibbutz Dwellers in Israel: Perceptions Regarding the Importance of Acquiring Higher Education, Viewed Through Bourdieu’s Theory of the Three Capital Types
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern society is organized as a social hierarchy, and individuals of higher status enjoy access to various advantages. Pierre Bourdieu, attempting to quantify social hierarchy, argued it can be observed through an individual’s possession of three intertwined, yet distinct, types of capital: economic capital (material resources), cultural capital (level of education) and social capital (social networks). It also known that acquiring higher education (greater cultural capital) is positively correlated with an increase in an individual’s income (economic capital). Our study examined whether population groups of two community types in Israel – Kibbutz (based on socialist principles) and Urban (based on capitalistic principles), held different views regarding encouraging their children to acquire higher education, as viewed through the prism of the three types of capital. We conducted a qualitative study of in-depth interviews with two population groups (15 individuals per group), one residing in Kibbutz, the other in Urban areas. Our study found significant differences in how each group guides their children to acquire higher education, a phenomenon which could increase inequality in Israeli society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".