MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413904206 · doi:10.1002/mds.70028

Allogeneic Bone Marrow‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Trial

2025· article· en· W4413904206 on OpenAlexaff
Mya C. Schiess, Jessika Suescun, Juan De Luigi Lemus, Charles E. Green, T Thomas, Shahnawaz Mohammad, Emily Tharp, Nikunj Satani, Jerome G. Saltarrelli, Christopher Adams, Marie Françoise Doursout, Vanessa Thyne, Rula Abuamouneh, Elsa M. Rodarte, Sean I. Savitz, Timothy M. Ellmore

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
FundersUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsPlaceboMedicineClinical endpointParkinson's diseaseRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineRating scaleNeuroinflammationPhysical therapySurgeryDiseasePsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Neuroinflammation contributes to Parkinson's disease (PD) progression and motor dysfunction. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells (allo-hMSCs) may reduce neuroinflammation and improve motor symptoms. OBJECTIVES: /kg allo-hMSCs in improving motor symptoms in patients with PD (PwP). METHODS: In this phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (November 2020-July 2023), mild-to-moderate PwP received either three allo-hMSC infusions, one placebo followed by two allo-hMSC infusions, or three placebo infusions at 18-week intervals. Follow-up lasted 88 weeks. The primary outcome was a >70% posterior probability (PP) of a difference in the proportion of participants with ≥5-point improvement in OFF-medication Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) at week 62. Bayesian analysis was conducted using R v4.2.0. RESULTS: Forty-five PwP were enrolled. A larger proportion of subjects achieved a ≥5-point improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III in the three-infusion arm compared with placebo at week 62 (mean difference [MD]: 5.0%, PP = 93.7%), translating to a 16.9-point improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III in the three-infusion arm compared with a 14.6-point improvement in the placebo arm. Conversely, fewer subjects in the two-infusion arm compared with placebo showed ≥5-point improvement at week 62 (MD: -62.4%, PP ≥ 99.9%), translating to only a 3.9-point improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III in the two-infusion arm. However, improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III was seen across all treatment arms. Adverse events were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: allo-hMSCs/kg improved motor function in mild-to-moderate PwP, while two infusions showed less improvement than placebo. To address this discrepancy, future studies should conduct functional potency assays to understand batch-to-batch variability affecting clinical efficacy. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207