Haudenosaunee storytelling as a philosophy of being in the world
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines the how Haudenosaunee storytelling and oral traditions constitute a philosophy of being in the world. Many Indigenous cultures, including the Haudenosaunee use oral traditions to pass on knowledge and this tradition has been continued in contemporary forms. This chapter begins by examining the important differentiation between stories about Indigenous people and stories told by Indigenous people. This is an important difference due to the insidious nature of ethnocentric stories about Indigenous peoples and the way that these stories distort understandings of Indigenous identity. Through an understanding of Indigenous oral tradition and storytelling it becomes clear that stories are a way of expressing and transmitting not only knowledge, but also a philosophy of what it means to be human in the world. Viola Cordova and Daniel Heath Justice pose questions about the world and our role as humans in the world which are philosophical in nature, but for Indigenous peoples are answered through storytelling. Therefore, a system of philosophy exists and is passed on through the traditional and contemporary stories of Indigenous cultures on Turtle Island. This chapter examines several aspects of the Haudenosaunee Creation Story and the philosophical ideas which emerge from this cosmology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it