MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413921024 · doi:10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100256

Green and cost-effective phyto fabrication of copper oxide nanoparticles for exploring its therapeutic applications

2025· article· en· W4413921024 on OpenAlexaff
Rajavi S. Karaveershettar, Joy H. Hoskeri, Pramod Bhasme, Arun K. Shettar

Bibliographic record

VenueNext Nanotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Canadian institutionsEmergent BioSolutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFabricationCopperNanoparticleNanotechnologyMaterials scienceMetallurgyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs) are gaining traction for their promising roles in various scientific and medical applications. This study highlights a green synthesis approach using hydroalcoholic extract of Bambusa vulgaris leaves as a natural reducing and stabilizing agent, with copper sulfate serving as the precursor. The solution's transformation to a greenish-brown hue indicated successful nanoparticle formation. Bioactive compounds extracted from the leaves facilitated the reduction and stabilization processes. Comprehensive characterization techniques—including UV-Vis spectroscopy, SEM-EDX, XRD, particle size analysis, and zeta potential measurements—were employed. A UV-Vis peak at 357 nm confirmed surface plasmon resonance, while SEM revealed cuboidal nanoparticle shapes with 46.03 % copper content. XRD affirmed the crystalline structure, and DLS analysis reported an average size of 70.9 nm with a zeta potential of −1 mV. Biological assessments showcased notable bioactivity: antioxidant capacity via DPPH assay, antibacterial effects through agar well diffusion, anticancer action against PC-3 cells using MTT assay, and enhanced wound closure observed in scratch assays. These results suggest that Bambusa vulgaris -derived CuONPs possess strong antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and wound-healing properties. Overall, this eco-friendly method presents a viable route for producing multifunctional CuONPs with significant therapeutic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNext NanotechnologySame topicNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsFrench-language works237,207