Exploring Token Serialization for Mamba-Based LiDAR Point Cloud Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LiDAR point cloud segmentation has increasingly benefited from the application of Mamba-based models. However, unordered and irregular natures of point clouds necessitates serialization, which significantly impacts the performance of Mamba-based methods. This paper explores the critical role of token serialization in Mamba-based point cloud processing, using the pure Mamba network, PointMamba, as the baseline. We systematically investigated existing point cloud serialization methods, evaluating their performance on two challenging LiDAR datasets: the airborne MultiSpectral LiDAR (MS-LiDAR) dataset and the aerial DALES dataset. To explore the inherent factors of serialization contributing to Mamba’s performance, we design novel indicators for serialization quality, focusing on spatial and semantic proximity. These indicators are validated across all datasets, offering a valuable reference and guidance for advancing token serialization in Mamba-based point cloud processing. Guided by these indicators, we proposed a new point cloud serialization method that integrates spatial and semantic features through a weighted comprehensive distance matrix. The proposed method achieves superior accuracy on both LiDAR datasets, surpassing existing approaches, and establishes a strong foundation for advancing Mamba-based point cloud processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".