MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413934395 · doi:10.2196/66411

Pilot Study of a Mobile, Virtual Reality–Based Digital Therapeutic for Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4413934395 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yeong Seon Jo, Arom Pyeon, Min-Kyung Hu, S. I. Kim, In Young Choi, Dai‐Jin Kim, Ji‐Won Chun

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintRandomized controlled trialSmoking cessationMedicinemHealthComputer sciencePsychological interventionWorld Wide WebNursingSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation remains a global challenge, with traditional treatments showing limited long-term success due to low adherence and accessibility issues. Digital therapeutics, such as mobile apps and virtual reality (VR)-based interventions, could offer innovative solutions for smoking cessation treatment. NICO-THERA is a digital therapeutic program integrating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) to address nicotine dependence. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NICO-THERA, a digital therapeutic intervention combining VR and mobile apps, for supporting smoking cessation among individuals with nicotine dependence. The primary focus was on smoking abstinence, nicotine dependence reduction, and motivation to quit smoking over a 12-week intervention period. METHODS: This open-label, exploratory, randomized controlled trial involved 30 participants randomly assigned to the digital therapeutic group (DTG; n=15; mean age 43.1 years; mean number of daily cigarettes: 9.5) or basic treatment group (BTG; n=15; mean age 48.7 years; mean number of daily cigarettes: 9.2). The DTG received the NICO-THERA program, involving VR sessions (relaxation training, craving coping, and refusal skills) and mobile app-based CBT and MET modules for daily therapeutic exercises. The BTG received basic care including video education and printed materials. The primary outcomes were the 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) and 30-day PPA at 8 weeks and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included nicotine dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence [FTND]) and motivation to change (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale-Smoking [SOCRATES-S]). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in 7-day and 30-day PPA between the DTG and BTG. However, in within-group analyses, the DTG showed significant improvements in both 7-day and 30-day PPA at week 8 (z=-2.00, P=.046), along with consistent reductions in smoking days and cigarette consumption across all time points. The BTG only significantly decreased cigarette consumption at week 8. Additionally, the DTG exhibited a significant increase in taking steps of motivation at week 12 (U=19.00, P=.048) compared with the BTG. No adverse device effects were reported. Adherence to smoking cessation diaries and medication logs was higher in the DTG (mean 83 of 84 days, 99%; 9 participants) than in the BTG (mean 74 of 84 days, 88%; 12 participants), based on the 12-week average adherence among those who completed the study. CONCLUSIONS: The NICO-THERA digital therapeutic program demonstrated preliminary effectiveness at reducing nicotine dependence. Additionally, participants in the DTG group exhibited a progressive improvement in their motivation to quit smoking, as reflected by a significant reduction in ambivalence at week 8 and increase in proactive cessation efforts at week 12. These results suggest that the structured integration of MET and CBT within the NICO-THERA program effectively reinforced psychological readiness for smoking cessation, fostering a sustained commitment to behavioral change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea KCT0009801; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=28285&status=5&seq_group=28285&search_page=M.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→