Learning SMILES Semantics: Word2Vec and Transformer Embeddings for Molecular Property Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the effectiveness of Word2Vec-based molecular representation learning on SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System) strings for a downstream prediction task related to the market approvability of chemical compounds. Here, market approvability is treated as a proxy classification label derived from approval status, where only the molecular structure is analyzed. We train character-level embeddings using Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) and Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling architectures and apply the resulting embeddings in a downstream classification task using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP). To evaluate the utility of these lightweight embedding techniques, we conduct experiments on a curated SMILES dataset labeled by approval status under both imbalanced and SMOTE-balanced training conditions. In addition to our Word2Vec-based models, we include a ChemBERTa-based baseline using the pretrained ChemBERTa-77M model. Our findings show that while ChemBERTa achieves a higher performance, the Word2Vec-based models offer a favorable trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. This efficiency is especially relevant in large-scale compound screening, where rapid exploration of the chemical space can support early-stage cheminformatics workflows. These results suggest that traditional embedding models can serve as viable alternatives for scalable and interpretable cheminformatics pipelines, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".