MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413934954 · doi:10.18103/mra.v13i8.6798

Successful Intravenous Thrombolysis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion in a Patient with Giant Cell Arteritis

2025· article· en· W4413934954 on OpenAlexaff
Anfal K. Shelig, G. Bryan Young, Norman Mainville, Ivan I. Pacheco Blandino

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Research Archives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsSouth Bruce Grey Health CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentral retinal artery occlusionGiant cell arteritisMedicineThrombolysisCentral retinal arteryArteritisOcclusionOphthalmologyRetinalCardiologyInternal medicineVasculitisMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmologic emergency, most often from non-arteritic etiology, but occasionally due to arteritic causes, especially giant cell arteritis (GCA), an inflammatory vasculitis affecting large and medium sized arteries. While thrombolytic therapy with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) has gathered interest in non-arteritic CRAO, its role in arteritic CRAO remains unexplored. We report a case of successful visual recovery following intravenous thrombolysis in a patient with GCA-associated CRAO, and compare this outcome with current literature. Observations: A patient presenting with acute monocular vision loss in her left eye was diagnosed with CRAO in the setting of active GCA and received IV tPA within 2.5 hours of symptom onset. Visual acuity, fundus findings, and safety outcomes were documented post-treatment. Following treatment, the patient demonstrated significant visual improvement, regaining functional acuity. This contrasts sharply with the typically poor visual prognosis in arteritic CRAO, despite corticosteroid therapy alone. In non-arteritic CRAO, IV tPA, when administered within 4.5 hours, has been shown to improve vision in 30–60% of cases, with an excellent safety profile and very low incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. No previous studies however have reported successful thrombolysis in arteritic CRAO. Conclusion: This case presents new evidence that early intravenous thrombolysis, in conjunction with corticosteroid therapy, may preserve vision in GCA-related CRAO by targeting a superimposed thrombotic component. While current guidelines do not support thrombolysis for arteritic CRAO, our findings suggest that a dual anti-inflammatory and thrombolytic approach could be effective in select patients. Further research is warranted to characterize patient selection criteria, optimize timing, and assess safety in this unique population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Research ArchivesSame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207