MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413936734 · doi:10.1111/tct.70199

From Fringe to Core: Speaking Out About Our Evolving Role as Patient Partners in the PARTENAIRES Interprofessional Education Programme

2025· article· en· W4413936734 on OpenAlexaffabout
Annie Descôteaux, Marie‐Pierre Codsi, Claudio Del Grande, Lucie Alègre, Tiffany Clovin, Benoît‐Pierre Stock, Mathieu Jackson, Vincent Dumez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Clinical Teacher · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCanadian Patient Safety Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipInterprofessional educationCurriculumMedical educationHealth careNursingMedicinePsychologyPedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: For the past 15 years, an innovative curriculum named Formation PARTENAIRES has been advancing patient partnership in interprofessional education (IPE) at Université de Montréal. The aim of this article is to describe, from the perspective of patients themselves, the changing role of patients within this training programme. APPROACH: The PARTENAIRES programme is a mandatory undergraduate IPE curriculum implemented across 13 healthcare and social services disciplines, involving over 5000 students and 125 patient partners annually. The programme's evolution has been marked by increasing patient leadership and is now co-chaired by a patient partner and a healthcare professional, with patients involved at all levels (design, delivery, assessment and improvement). EVALUATION: Key developments in patients' relationships with other stakeholders involved in the PARTENAIRES programme are highlighted. With students, patients have transitioned from providing one-off, idealised testimonials to sustaining reflexive, real conversations that bridge the student-patient gap. With academic disciplines, patient partners that were initially paired based on matching with their lived experience are now paired more flexibly to foster a universal educational contribution and support interdisciplinary learning. With clinical co-facilitators, the patients' role has evolved from reactive participation during workshops to proactive co-construction, promoting the democratisation of exchanges and shared responsibility for the programme's educational content. IMPLICATIONS: Sustained institutional trust and long-term involvement have enabled patient partners to become central co-creators in the PARTENAIRES curriculum. Patients' transversal role fosters innovation and cross-disciplinary collaboration, illustrating that significant cultural change in IPE emerges through openness, adaptability and the time to grow together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0050.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.435 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Clinical TeacherSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207