MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413938704 · doi:10.1007/s40257-025-00975-3

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks

2025· article· en· W4413938704 on OpenAlexaff
Alan D. Irvine, Vimal H. Prajapati, Emma Guttman‐Yassky, Eric L. Simpson, Kim Papp, Andrew Blauvelt, Chia‐Yu Chu, Hwanhee Hong, Linda Stein Gold, Marjolein de Bruin‐Weller, Thomas Bieber, Kenji Kabashima, David Rosmarin, Cristina Sancho, Brian Calimlim, Ayman Grada, Yang Yang, Xiaoqiang Wu, Gweneth Levy, Eliza M. Raymundo, Henrique D. Teixeira, Jonathan I. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoProbity Medical ResearchSKiN HealthUniversity of Calgary
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsMedicineAtopic dermatitisRandomized controlled trialPharmacotherapyDermatologyClinical trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents; long-term efficacy and safety data beyond 1 year are needed. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment through 140 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Measure Up 1 (MeUp1; NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (MeUp2; NCT03607422), and AD Up (NCT03568318) are ongoing, phase 3, randomized clinical trials evaluating upadacitinib 15 mg (UPA15) and 30 mg (UPA30) in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. This interim analysis evaluated efficacy and safety through week 140. At baseline, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily UPA15, UPA30, or placebo alone (MeUp1/2) or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (AD Up). At week 16, patients initially randomized to placebo were rerandomized 1:1 to UPA15 or UPA30. Skin and itch efficacy assessments included achievement of ≥ 75%/≥ 90%/100% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75/90/100), validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of clear/almost clear (vIGA-AD 0/1), and ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (∆WP-NRS≥4). Safety assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 2782 patients were randomized in MeUp1/2 or AD Up. Efficacy response rates, including optimal outcomes such as EASI 90 and WP-NRS score of 0/1, were sustained through week 140 in all three studies. At week 140, EASI 75 was achieved by 85.5%/90.5% (UPA15/UPA30; integrated MeUp1/2) and 81.5%/90.0% (UPA15/UPA30; AD Up) of patients, and vIGA-AD 0/1 was achieved by 56.6%/64.4% (UPA15/UPA30; integrated MeUp1/2) and 52.0%/56.8% (UPA15/UPA30; AD Up) of patients. Over 60% of patients across all three studies achieved ∆WP-NRS≥4 at week 140. Pooled safety data across all three studies demonstrated safety profiles consistent with 16-week and 52-week analyses. CONCLUSIONS: UPA15 and UPA30 with and without topical corticosteroids demonstrated robust, durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile through 140 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03569293 ), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03607422 ), and AD Up (NCT03568318; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03568318 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207