MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413941939 · doi:10.1029/2025jc022899

ENSO Influences Subsurface Marine Heatwave Occurrence in the Kuroshio Extension

2025· article· en· W4413941939 on OpenAlexaff
Mitchell Chandler, Janet Sprintall, Nathalie Zilberman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsOceanographyEl Niño Southern OscillationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extreme ocean temperature events, also known as marine heatwaves (MHWs), can have devastating consequences for ecosystems, communities, and economies. However, the ability to understand and predict MHWs beneath the sea surface is limited by a scarcity of subsurface observations. Here, we combined in situ temperature observations from a High‐Resolution eXpendable BathyThermograph (HR‐XBT) transect in the northwest Pacific Ocean with satellite observations to produce a multidecadal (1993–2022) subsurface temperature time series with 10‐day temporal resolution. This novel time series was used to examine MHWs between the surface and 800‐m deep in the Kuroshio‐Kuroshio Extension region east of Japan. The length of this 30‐year time series also permitted exploration of long‐term trends and interannual variability in subsurface temperature. Variability in the Kuroshio‐Kuroshio Extension system is found to exert a strong control on the occurrence of MHWs along the transect. Throughout the upper 800‐m of the water column, Kuroshio warming drove a significant increase in Kuroshio MHW days per year. Notably, the largest mean MHW event intensities were observed in the subsurface at every location along the transect rather than at the sea surface. Strengthening of the Kuroshio Extension and its southern recirculation gyre during El Niño drove a significant increase in subsurface MHWs where the intensified current system intersected the transect. In contrast, surface MHW occurrence along the transect was not influenced by the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Clearly, relying only on sea surface temperature observations does not provide the full picture of MHWs in this highly dynamic region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207